Publications

2014
Tai L CD. Strengths and Weaknesses in the Case for SEC Capture. Law and Financial Markets Review. 2014;8 (3).
Einhorn R, Schickler E, Anthony S. C. Studies in American Political Development. 2014.
Thomas J. S, Carpenter D, Aaron S. K. Target small firms for antibiotic innovation. Science. 2014;344 (6187) :967 - 969.
Carpenter D, Moore CD. When Canvassers Became Activists: Antislavery Petitioning and the Political Mobilization of American Women. American Political Science Review. 2014;108 (3) :479 - 498. whencanvassersbecameactivists-apsrpublishedaugust2014.pdf
2012
Carpenter D KG. Reputation and Public Administration. Public Administration Review. 2012;72 (1).
Shrank WH, Choudhry NK TMFMASSBTALJNMACAJK. Warnings without Guidance: Patient Responses to an FDA Warning about Ezetimibe. Medical Care. 2012;50 (6).
D C. Is Health Politics Different?. Annual Review of Political Science. 2012;15.
Carpenter D, Krause G. Reputation and Public Administration. Public Administration Review. 2012;72 (1) :26 - 32. Publisher's VersionAbstract
This article examines the application of organizational reputation to public administration. Organizational reputation is defined as a set of beliefs about an organization’s capacities, intentions, history, and mission that are embedded in a network of multiple audiences. The authors assert that the way in which organizational reputations are formed and subsequently cultivated is fundamental to understanding the role of public administration in a democracy. A review of the basic assumptions and empirical work on organizational reputation in the public sector identifies a series of stylized facts that extends our understanding of the functioning of public agencies. In particular, the authors examine the relationship between organizational reputation and bureaucratic autonomy.
Carpenter D, Chattopadhyay J, Moffitt S, Nall C. The Complications of Controlling Agency Time Discretion: FDA Deadlines and Postmarket Drug Safety. American Journal of Political Science. 2012. fdadeadlinesandsafety_ajps2012.pdf
2011
Carpenter D TD. Bioequivalence: The Regulatory Career of a Pharmaceutical Concept. Bulletin of the History of Medicine. 2011;85 (1). 85.1.carpenter-bullhistmedfinal.pdf
Carpenter D, Kesselheim A JS. A Unique Physician Identifier for the Physician Payments Sunshine Act. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2011;305 (19).
Carpenter D, Kesselheim A JS. Reputation and Precedent in the Bevacizumab Decision. New England Journal of Medicine. 2011.
Carpenter D, Tobbell D. “Bioequivalence: The Regulatory Career of a Pharmaceutical Concept”. Bulletin of the History of Medicine. 2011;85 (1) :93-131. Publisher's VersionAbstract

Generic drugs cannot be marketed without regulatory and clini- cal demonstration of “bioequivalence.” The authors argue that the concept of “bioequivalence” is a joint regulatory and scientific creation, not purely a tech- nical concept, and not purely a legal concept. It developed at the interstices of networks of pharmacologists, regulators, food and drug lawyers, and American and European policy makers interested in “generic” drugs. This article provides a situated perspective on the history of bioequivalence, which emphasizes the shaping role of the state upon scientific processes, networks of regulators and scientists, and the centrality of transnational dynamics in the formation of drug regulatory standards.

2010
Reputation and Power: Organizational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA
Carpenter D. Reputation and Power: Organizational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA.; 2010. Publisher's Version i9205.pdf
Carpenter D, Keyhani S, Anderson G, Hebert P, Wang S. “U.S. Pharmaceutical Innovation in an International Context” . American Journal of Public Health. 2010;(6) :1075-1080. Publisher's Version

Pages